A novel simulation module for segmental mandibulectomy and mandible reconstruction using 3D models.

INTRODUCTION: Mandibular resection and reconstruction are common but complex procedures in head and neck surgery. Resection with adequate margins is critical to the success of the procedure but technical training is restricted to real case experience. Here we describe our experience in the development and evaluation of a mandibular resection and reconstruction simulation module. METHODS: 3D printed (3DP) models of a mandible with a pathologic lesion were developed from imaging data from a patient with an ameloblastoma. During an educational conference, otolaryngology trainees participated in a simulation in which they reviewed a CT scan of the pathologic mandible and then planned their osteotomies before and after handling a 3DP model demonstrating the lesion. The adequacy of the osteotomy margins was assessed and components of the simulation were rated by participants with pre- and post-training surveys. RESULTS: 52 participants met criteria. After reviewing the CT scan, 34 participants (65.3 %) proposed osteotomies clear of the lesion. This proportion improved to 48 (92.3 %, p = 0.001) after handling the 3D model. Among those with initially adequate margins (n = 33), 45.5 % decreased their margins closer to the ideal, 27.2 % made no revision, 21.2 % widened their margins. 92 % of participants found the simulation beneficial for surgical planning and technical training. After the exercise, the majority of participants had increased confidence in conceptualizing the boundaries of the lesion (69.2 %) and their abilities to ablate (76.5 %). CONCLUSIONS: The structured mandibulectomy simulation using 3DP models was useful in the development of trainee experience in segmental mandible resection. LAY SUMMARY: This study presents the first mandibulectomy simulation module for trainees with the use of 3DP models. The use of a 3DP model was also shown to improve the quality of surgical training.

Airway management of angioedema patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IMPORTANCE: The COVID-19 pandemic is characterized by high transmissibility from patients with prolonged minimally- or asymptomatic periods, with a particularly increased risk of spread during aerosol-generating procedures, including endotracheal intubation. OBSERVATIONS: All patients presenting with upper airway obstruction due to angioedema during this time should be carefully managed in a way that is safest for both patient and provider. CONCLUSIONS: For patients requiring emergent airway management during the COVID-19 pandemic, minimization of aerosols while taking the necessary precautions to protect healthcare workers should are critical principles for their management.

Outcomes After Tracheostomy in COVID-19 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcomes of patients undergoing tracheostomy for COVID-19 and of healthcare workers performing these procedures. BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy is often performed for prolonged endotracheal intubation in critically ill patients. However, in the context of COVID-19, tracheostomy placement pathways have been altered due to the poor prognosis of intubated patients and the risk of transmission to providers through this highly aerosolizing procedure. METHODS: A prospective single-system multi-center observational cohort study was performed on patients who underwent tracheostomy after acute respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19. RESULTS: Of the 53 patients who underwent tracheostomy, the average time from endotracheal intubation to tracheostomy was 19.7 days ±â€Š6.9 days. The most common indication for tracheostomy was acute respiratory distress syndrome, followed by failure to wean ventilation and post-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation decannulation. Thirty patients (56.6%) were liberated from the ventilator, 16 (30.2%) have been discharged alive, 7 (13.2%) have been decannulated, and 6 (11.3%) died. The average time from tracheostomy to ventilator liberation was 11.8 days ±â€Š6.9 days (range 2-32 days). Both open surgical and percutaneous dilational tracheostomy techniques were performed utilizing methods to mitigate aerosols. No healthcare worker transmissions resulted from performing the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations to tracheostomy practices and processes were successfully instituted. Following these steps, tracheostomy in COVID-19 intubated patients seems safe for both patients and healthcare workers performing the procedure.

Percutaneous laryngeal collagen augmentation for treatment of parkinsonian hypophonia.

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to determine whether percutaneous laryngeal collagen augmentation improves hypophonia in parkinsonian patients. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective review of 18 patients was performed. Patients and/or caretakers were called on the telephone and asked about their response to the procedure, if any. Videostroboscopic examinations for all patients were reviewed. RESULTS: Of 18 patients, 11 (61%) reported improvement in their hypophonia for a period of at least 2 months. Five of 7 patients without improvement were relatively aphonic both before and after the procedure. Five of 7 patients without improvement had severe dysphagia, which in 3 necessitated gastrostomy tube placement. Four of 7 patients without improvement were not ambulatory at the time of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous laryngeal collagen augmentation is an effective treatment for parkinsonian hypophonia in a majority of patients. Patients with advanced neurologic disease with aphonia, difficulty with speech initiation, dysphagia, or ambulatory difficulty are less likely to respond to this procedure and should be so informed.